MisleadingCharts
Back to the gallery

Ten small organs to a dot, and a dot of its own for every giant

Showing the misleading chart

Be the first to star this exhibit

An organ committee we invented reads a scatter of 46,160 real pipe-organ entries — every entry in the Organ Historical Society’s database with a year and a rank count — and concludes that sixty ranks is middle of the road. Years and ranks are whole numbers, so organs tie exactly and the 46,160 become 9,436 opaque dots: at the bottom, about ten organs share each dot, and from a hundred ranks up nearly every organ gets one to itself. The eighth of organs with 40 ranks or more ends up with 52% of the ink. Counted instead of dotted, sixty ranks is bigger than 96.0% of them.

01The claim

Organs come in every size, and sixty ranks is middle of the road. Every point on the slide is a real entry in the Organ Historical Society’s Pipe Organ Database: 46,160 organ entries dated 1800 to 2026 that record how many ranks of pipes they have. Nothing is sampled, smoothed or binned, nothing too small or too large has been left out, and both axes are linear, with ranks starting at zero. Drawn one dot per organ, the cloud fills the frame from one-rank chamber organs to the Wanamaker Organ in Philadelphia at 464, and a line at sixty ranks runs straight through the thick of it, with dots packed above it all the way to the top. So the committee of our invented chapel recommends sixty ranks and four manuals, with gallery space reserved for a future 32-foot stop — because anything smaller would put them below the middle of the field.

02The trick

A scatter plot can only say “at least one organ here”, and on this one that is all it gets to say. Years and ranks are both whole numbers, so organs of the same size from the same year do not nearly overlap — they land on exactly the same spot, and an opaque dot drawn on top of an opaque dot adds nothing. The 46,160 organs are drawn as 9,436 dots. Then the dot size finishes the job: each dot is about five ranks tall and more than a year wide, so even organs a rank or a year apart merge into one shape. How many organs each dot stands for depends on where it is: among organs of 1 to 10 ranks, 16,127 of them share 1,606 dots, about ten to a dot, and the spot at 1947 and 3 ranks holds 76 organs under one mark. At a hundred ranks and over, 304 entries get 292 dots — a dot of their own, nearly every one — and they are not even 304 organs: they come from 222 buildings, because a rebuilt organ is a new entry, and Crystal Cathedral’s 293 ranks are on the chart three times. So the ink stops tracking the count exactly where the count is largest. The bottom of the chart, where most of the organs are, fuses into a flat slab whose size is set by how far the crowd spreads, not how many are in it; the thinly populated top gets a full dot for every giant. We measured the result on the rendered chart: the 5,770 organs of 40 ranks or more, one in eight, cover 52% of the blue pixels, and the 29,044 organs of 20 ranks or fewer, nearly two thirds of the database, get 3,296 dots — fewer than the big eighth’s 3,372. The eye reads covered area as quantity, so the chart reports the range of organ sizes and passes it off as their distribution. Nothing else is wrong: the axes are honest, no organ is missing, and every dot sits exactly where it belongs. (The chapel and its committee are our invention, to give the chart a job; every organ is the database’s.)

03The fix

Draw the counts instead of the organs. Bin the same plane into five-year, two-rank cells and shade each cell by how many organs it holds, on one light-to-dark scale with a legend, and the picture turns over: the dark mass is a band between about 2 and 20 ranks running from the 1900s to the 1980s, and everything above 40 ranks is pale. Add a median line for each five-year span and a 90th-percentile line, and “typical” stops being an impression: the median organ in the whole database has 15 ranks, nine in ten have 43 or fewer, and 44,304 of the 46,160 — 96.0% — have fewer than sixty. Taste has grown, and the chart shows that too: the median organ dated since 2000 has 24 ranks and the 90th percentile has climbed into the sixties. Even so, 88.6% of the 4,134 organs from 2000 to 2026 are smaller than the proposal. A share-of-organs histogram in the margin makes the same point from the side, peaking at 21.4% for organs of 6 to 10 ranks. Keep the giants — the Wanamaker, Boardwalk Hall and the rest are real, and the 293 organs above a hundred ranks go in a strip of their own along the top, counted rather than shaded — but label them as what they are, one entry each, and say that a rank count is the entry’s own, which for the Wanamaker, dated 1911, is the 464 ranks the organ grew to later. For a small table, transparency or a little jitter would do the same job; for forty-six thousand whole-number records drawn at this size, even jitter leaves a slab, and counting is the only thing that works. The committee may still want sixty ranks. It just cannot call them the middle of the road.